| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2023-10-11
|
| Emphasis |
N: FALL, P: FALL
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2023-12-26 |
| Current Penalty |
3349.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
3349.0 |
| Final Order |
2024-02-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a)4550 Tule Lake Dr, Littleton, CO 80123: On or about October 11, 2023, and at times prior, employees were exposed to fall hazards of 9 feet to the ground below, while performing roofing operations on a residential house without fall protection. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260503 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2023-12-26 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2024-02-15 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a) 4550 Tule Lake Dr, Littleton, CO 80123: On or about October 11, 2023, and at times prior, employees were exposed to fall hazards of 9 feet to the ground below, while performing roofing operations on a residential house without fall protection. The foreman had fall protection in the work truck but did not think it was needed due to the low slope of the roof. |
|
|
