Search icon

Static Coatings LLC

Company Details

Name: Static Coatings LLC
Jurisdiction: Colorado
Legal type: Domestic limited liability company
Status: Good Standing
Date of registration: 23 Jun 2021 (4 years ago)
Entity Number: 20211578118
ZIP code: 80110
County: Arapahoe County
Place of Formation: COLORADO
Principal Address: 2880 S. Raritan St. Englewood CO 80110 US

Transaction History

Transaction ID Type Date Effective date Name Comment
20241835229 File Report 2024-08-06 2024-08-06 No data No data
20231825996 File Report 2023-08-07 2023-08-07 No data No data
20221665356 File Report 2022-07-06 2022-07-06 No data Change of Registered Agent / Change of Registered Agent Address / Change of Entity Address
20211578118 Form a Limited Liability Company (LLC) 2021-06-23 2021-06-23 Static Coatings LLC No data

OSHA's Inspections within Industry

Inspection Nr Report ID Date Opened Site Address
347470486 0830600 2024-05-08 2750 SOUTH RARITAN STREET, ENGLEWOOD, CO, 80110
Inspection Type Complaint
Scope Partial
Safety/Health Health
Close Conference 2024-05-08
Emphasis L: Noise, L: PIV8, N: AMPUTATE, N: DUSTEXPL

Related Activity

Type Inspection
Activity Nr 1748387
Health Yes
Type Complaint
Activity Nr 2154555
Health Yes

Violation Items

Citation ID 01001A
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100095 C01
Issuance Date 2024-09-11
Abatement Due Date 2024-10-09
Current Penalty 4839.0
Initial Penalty 4839.0
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: a.) On or about May 30, 2024, and at times prior, employees were exposed to noise levels above the OSHA action level . The employer did not have a Hearing Conservation Program in effect. On May 30, 2024 OSHA conducted noise dosimetry and found one out of three sampled employees were exposed to noise above the OSHA Action Level (8-hour Time Weighted Average) of 85 dBa. The employee was exposed to noise levels of 87 decibels over an 8-hour TWA. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (see enclosed Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet).
Citation ID 01001B
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100095 D01
Issuance Date 2024-09-11
Abatement Due Date 2024-10-09
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program: a) On or about May 30, 2024, and at times prior, employees were exposed to noise levels above the OSHA Action Level. The employer has never conducted noise sampling at this facility. On May 30, 2024, OSHA conducted noise dosimetry and found one out of the three employees sampled exposed to noise above the OSHA Action Level for an 8-hour Time Weighted Average of 85 decibels. One of the employees was exposed to noise levels at 87.0 dBA. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (see enclosed Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet).
Citation ID 01001C
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100095 G01
Issuance Date 2024-09-11
Abatement Due Date 2024-10-09
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1):The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels: a.) On or about May 30, 2024, and at times prior, the employer did not provide audiometric testing to employees who were exposed to hazardous noise. The employer did not establish an audiometric program and did not test employees. On May 30, 2024, OSHA conducted noise dosimetry and found one out of three employees exposed to noise above the OSHA Action Level for an 8 hour Time Weighted Average. The employee was exposed to a noise Time Weighted Average of 87.0 dBA. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (see enclosed Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet).
Citation ID 01001D
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100095 K01
Issuance Date 2024-09-11
Abatement Due Date 2024-10-09
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1):The employer did not train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(k). The employer did not institute a training program and ensure employee participation in the program: a) On or about May 30, 2024, and at times prior, employees who were exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour TWA of 85 decibels were not trained on exposure to hazardous noise. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (see enclosed Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet).
Citation ID 01002A
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100134 C01
Issuance Date 2024-09-11
Abatement Due Date 2024-10-09
Current Penalty 4839.0
Initial Penalty 4839.0
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a) On or about May 30, 2024, and at times prior, the employer did not provide a written program when employees were required (mandatory) to wear half-face respirators during powder coating and grinding operations. Employees performing powder coating paint activities are required to wear half-face respirators. There was no written program established for use of mandatory respirators, exposing employees to inhalation hazards such as carbon black. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (see enclosed Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet).
Citation ID 01002B
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100134 E01
Issuance Date 2024-09-11
Abatement Due Date 2024-10-09
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a.) On or about May 30, 2024, and at times prior, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to employees who wore half-face respirators in the workplace. The employee spraying powder coating was observed wearing a half-face respirator; there were no medical evaluations before usage, exposing employees to physiological burdens. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (see enclosed Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet).
Citation ID 01002C
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100134 F01
Issuance Date 2024-09-11
Abatement Due Date 2024-10-09
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): a.) On or about May 30, 2024, and at times prior, the employer did not provide fit tests for employees who were required to wear 3M half-face respirators in the workplace. Employees conducting powder coating were observed wearing a half-face respirator; there were no fit tests completed, exposing employees to inhalation hazards such as carbon black. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (see enclosed Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet).
Citation ID 01002D
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100134 K
Issuance Date 2024-09-11
Abatement Due Date 2024-10-09
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
Gravity 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary: a.) On or about May 30, 2024, and at times prior, employees were exposed to inhalation hazards such as carbon black. The employer did not provide effective training to employees who are required to use respirators. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (see enclosed Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet).
Citation ID 01003
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100147 C01
Issuance Date 2024-09-11
Abatement Due Date 2024-10-09
Current Penalty 8067.0
Initial Penalty 8067.0
Nr Instances 2
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1):The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: a) On or about May 30, 2024, and at times prior, employees were exposed to electrical hazards, pinch points, and caught-in hazards. The employer failed to establish a Lock Out Tag Out Program to properly shut down the powder coating machine and its components (e.g. air compressors, oven, moving line). There was risk for energized machine startup and pinch points/caught-in hazards because the employees are instructed to use standby mode and a piece of paper covering the screen as their LOTO method. b) On or about May 30, 2024, and at times prior, employees were exposed to electrical hazards, pinch points, and caught-in hazards. The employer failed to establish a Lock Out Tag Out Program to properly shut down the sublimator. The sublimator machine has moving belts and parts which can cause caught-in and pinch points. The sublimator can be accessed through a door which is not permanently locked (keys were left in the doorknob at all times for anyone to access the sublimator while the machine is operating). There is no lock out tag out procedure when employees are working on the sublimator.
Citation ID 01004
Citaton Type Serious
Standard Cited 19100212 A01
Issuance Date 2024-09-11
Abatement Due Date 2024-10-09
Current Penalty 6453.0
Initial Penalty 6453.0
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 2
Gravity 5
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1):One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a) On or about May 30, 2024, and at times prior, employees were exposed to crush by, amputation, and nip point hazards in the powder coating line area. The employer failed to ensure the moving powder coating guns were guarded so that an employee could not get caught into the powder coating guns as they move vertically up and down.
Citation ID 02001A
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19100132 D01
Issuance Date 2024-09-11
Abatement Due Date 2024-10-09
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1):The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): a) On or about May 30, 2024, employees were exposed to skin irritation hazards. The employer failed to conduct a hazard assessment for the powder coating process which necessitates the use of personal protective equipment such as chemical-resistant gloves and additional skin protection measures.
Citation ID 02001B
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19100132 D02
Issuance Date 2024-09-11
Abatement Due Date 2024-10-09
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 1
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed: a) On or about May 30, 2024, employees were exposed to skin irritation hazards. The employer failed to provide written record that a hazard assessment had been performed for the powder coating process which necessitates the use of personal protective equipment such as chemical-resistant gloves and additional skin protection measures.
Citation ID 02002
Citaton Type Other
Standard Cited 19101200 E01
Issuance Date 2024-09-11
Abatement Due Date 2024-10-09
Current Penalty 0.0
Initial Penalty 0.0
Nr Instances 1
Nr Exposed 26
FTA Current Penalty 0.0
Citation text line 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program that included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): a.) On or about May 30, 2024, and at times prior, employees were exposed to hazardous chemicals while conducting powder coating operations. The employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program for employees to review.

Date of last update: 10 Feb 2025

Sources: Colorado's Secretary of State