| Inspection Type |
Planned
|
| Scope |
Partial
|
| Safety/Health |
Safety
|
| Close Conference |
2011-09-22
|
| Emphasis |
L: FALL-CON
|
| Case Closed |
2014-11-03
|
Violation Items
| Citation ID |
01001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19261053 B06 |
| Issuance Date |
2011-10-21 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2011-10-26 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
6600.0 |
| Contest Date |
2011-11-15 |
| Final Order |
2014-02-12 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6): Ladders were used on surfaces which were not stable and level: (a) On or about September 22, 2011, Weatherguard Construction Company, as the controlling employer, did not ensure that Eloy Martinez, a subconstractor, protected their employees from fall hazards while using an extension ladder for access to roof area, that was placed on loose rocks. |
|
| Citation ID |
02001 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260100 A |
| Issuance Date |
2011-10-21 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2011-10-26 |
| Current Penalty |
7000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
6600.0 |
| Contest Date |
2011-11-15 |
| Final Order |
2014-02-12 |
| Nr Exposed |
6 |
| Gravity |
1 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a) On or about September 22, 2011, Weatherguard Construction Company, as the controlling employer, did not ensure that Eloy Martinez, a subcontractor, protected their employees from head injuires while working in areas on both the ground and on the roof while old shingles and pieces of sheet metal were being tossed around and where no head protection was in use. |
|
| Citation ID |
02002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260102 A01 |
| Issuance Date |
2011-10-21 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2011-10-26 |
| Current Penalty |
7000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
8800.0 |
| Contest Date |
2011-11-15 |
| Final Order |
2014-02-12 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
6 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a) On or about September 22, 2011, Weatherguard Construction Company, as the controlling employer, did not ensure that Eloy Martinez, a subcontractor, protected their employees from eye injury while being exposed to flying shingle and sheet metal particles and using pneumatic guns without eye protection. |
|
| Citation ID |
02003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19260501 B13 |
| Issuance Date |
2011-10-21 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2011-10-26 |
| Current Penalty |
7000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
15400.0 |
| Contest Date |
2011-11-15 |
| Final Order |
2014-02-12 |
| Nr Exposed |
5 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activites 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest system, nor were other provisions of paragraph (b) of this section used to provide an alternative fall protection measure: a) On or about September 22, 2011, Weatherguard Construction Company, as the controlling employer, did not ensure that Eloy Martinez, a subcontractor, protected their employees from falls in excess of 9 feet while removing shingles from a roof area without fall protection. |
|
|
